Johannesburg – Former President Jacob Zuma, now a leader within the uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) party, has issued a firm ultimatum to the African National Congress (ANC): schedule a physical disciplinary hearing instead of a virtual one. Zuma, who remains an ANC member, is set to face a disciplinary hearing on Wednesday.
Virtual vs. In-Person Hearing
Despite plans for a virtual hearing, the MK party is adamant that Zuma appears in person. If this demand is not met, Zuma’s legal team will seek an urgent court interdict to halt the proceedings. MK party spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela emphasized that the ANC Disciplinary Committee has yet to respond to their request for a physical venue.
“The ANC Disciplinary Committee has not yet responded to a request made by President Zuma’s lawyers that the hearing should take place at a physical venue, and in person as previously agreed between the parties per the relevant provisions of the ANC’s Constitution,” Ndhlela stated.
Allegations of Bias
Ndhlela further accused the ANC of bias, noting that arrangements for a physical hearing were previously confirmed but were suddenly changed due to purported security concerns.
“The same DC representatives had previously confirmed President Zuma’s attendance at Luthuli House for the kangaroo court to be attended in person, but suddenly decided at a whim to postpone the in-person hearing amid a pre-election climate because of so-called fictitious security fears expressed by the ANC of Ramaphosa,” Ndhlela added.
Tony Yengeni to Represent Zuma
In line with ANC Constitution rule 25, Zuma is entitled to be represented by any fellow member of the ANC. He has chosen Tony Yengeni, a long-standing struggle veteran and former ANC NEC member, to represent him.
“President Zuma believes that Commander Tony Yengeni is well placed as a seasoned Commander of uMkhonto weSizwe to represent him in the kangaroo court convened against him by the sellout ANC of Ramaphosa, Steenhuisen, and Groenewald,” Ndhlela said.
Charges Against Zuma
Zuma faces two counts of contravening ANC rules, including violating the party’s constitution by publicly endorsing the newly formed MK party last year and appearing on its candidate list. Rule 25 of the ANC constitution considers actions like not campaigning or voting for the ANC a breach of the party’s constitution.
The NEC initially chose not to expel Zuma from the ANC to avoid longer disciplinary processes, which they believed he would not attend. In December, Zuma announced his support for the MK party in the 2024 general elections, citing a deviation from the ANC’s core values.
Industry Insights and Context
Political Dynamics and Implications
Zuma’s demand for a physical hearing highlights ongoing tensions within the ANC. His endorsement of the MK party and the subsequent disciplinary action underscore the fractured state of South Africa’s political landscape.
The insistence on a physical hearing, coupled with allegations of bias, suggests deep-rooted mistrust and factionalism within the party.
Economic Ramifications
The internal strife within the ANC could have broader implications for South Africa’s economic stability. Political uncertainty often leads to economic volatility, potentially affecting investor confidence and economic policy consistency.
Zuma’s support for a rival party may also influence voter sentiment and the overall political climate ahead of the 2024 general elections.
Future Prospects
The outcome of Zuma’s disciplinary hearing and his continued influence within South African politics will be closely watched. Whether the ANC can navigate these internal challenges while maintaining a unified front will be critical for its political survival and effectiveness in addressing the country’s socio-economic issues.
